A Solana token review starts with the mint being examined and the permissions attached to it. Use this framework to organize public observations, project explanations, and questions that still need evidence. Work through identity, controls, supply, and the route by which a holder could transfer or exit a position. Keep the observation date beside each finding so another reviewer can repeat the checks. This page provides a research structure for assessing a candidate; it does not supply current token data or a personalized investment recommendation.
What to examine
Anchor the review to the complete mint address, network, and relevant token program. Compare that identity across the project material and the market being examined. Preserve disagreements in the record instead of assuming that a matching symbol or familiar logo establishes that the sources describe the same token.
Document the observed issuance and freeze roles, then identify the party or arrangement associated with each active permission. Ask which policy explains its use and what evidence supports that explanation. State the specific role examined so a finding about one control is not mistaken for a complete control review.
Reconcile the observed supply with any circulation estimate, documenting exclusions and their justification. Examine holder concentration separately from the trading route. For a hypothetical exit, record the proposed size, quote asset, fees, and assumptions that would need refreshing before the estimate could inform an actual decision.
A practical review sequence
Record the mint, network, observation time, and purpose of the review. Identify the public records and project documents available. Choose the questions that must be answered first, then assign a place for evidence, interpretation, and unresolved items in the working note.
Read the permission fields associated with the actual configuration and preserve the result. Compare active roles with the documented operating policy. If a signing arrangement or restriction is claimed, identify the supporting evidence and flag any part that cannot yet be verified.
Check that supply figures use compatible units and dates. Explain each adjustment to circulation or concentration. Review indicative execution at the stated size, including the destination asset, and keep the quote conditions separate from any claim about future market access or pricing.
Summarize what the evidence supports, where it conflicts, and what remains unknown. Name the next useful check for each consequential gap. Set review triggers around changed authorities, new issuance, releases, or altered trading conditions so the note can be updated without restarting.
Primary-source context: Assets on Solana. Use it alongside the asset-specific records relevant to your review.
Questions to resolve
Begin with public account information, project documents, and recorded market observations. Identify exactly what each source shows before considering an interaction. If a later step asks for a signature, inspect its purpose and permissions separately; basic identity research should already have a documented foundation.
It addresses the issuance permission that was inspected. Continue examining the remaining configuration, supply assumptions, concentrated balances, and execution dependencies. Write the conclusion in terms of that specific role and its observation date, keeping broader judgments tied to their own evidence.
Compare observation dates, units, definitions, and the balances included by each source. Reconstruct any circulation calculation with its deductions shown separately. If the difference cannot be reconciled, retain both figures with an explanation of the uncertainty and identify which comparison it prevents.
Read the Lab
A token's name and price chart reveal little about its controls. Build a Solana screening record that connects the correct mint to supply permissions, concentration, liquidity, and the evidence needed to resolve uncertain findings.
Read the guide: Solana Token Screening: Mint Authorities, Supply, and LiquidityDifferent asset names can conceal the same underlying dependencies. Build an exposure map that connects holdings to custody, counterparties, markets, revenue sources, and operating costs, then use simple scenarios to identify what needs closer review.
Read the guide: Build a Digital Asset Portfolio Exposure MapRelated screening lenses
Questions worth asking
Explore a new asset class or suggest a topic for the Lab.
